object makes them very easy to use as well. I'm using some of them
myself. They have the issues that SONAR always has, but they don't have
the issues that the IR rangers have. In short, they are a good thing to
use for medium range (1 foot to 10 feet, IMO.
DLC
jasuk1970 wrote:
> Hi,
> Has anyone used the MaxSonar LV EZ1 range sensor before?
>
> Due to an accident with too much bare capacitor legs causing a short
> (It was an honest mistake honest!) I've managed to kill my Sharp
> GP2d120's. For a replacement, I was thinking about using ultrasonic
> instead of IR.
>
> Firstly, is this a better way of object sensing?
>
> Secondly what sensor to use? I am going to have 3 in total on the
> front of my Rogue Blue ERS robot chassis.
>
> The one I was looking at was:
> http://www.robotchat.org/index.php?topic=11.0
>
> This is due to it using a analogue voltage as an option (Which is
> great for my OOBoard) I've looked at the Daventech ones but they seem
> a lot more complicated to read from. (And the higher models require
> I2C bus)
>
> Are there better ones at around the same price as the MaxSonar?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Jas
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Clark ooPIC Tech Support
www.oopic.com
------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment