Re: [oopic] Re: Digital Potentiometers

Well coding in C is a little over my head. What I was hoping to do is activate a sequence of pot adjustments and other external devices and switches with a single external button. 5ms might just do it. I was hoping it would be similar to the oServo programing format. Since that is very similar to what I am doing.

Sounds like it is time to make a Resistive Digital-to-Analog Converter object. I think it would be really useful. Basically it would mean that any analog device could be easily hacked and then manipulated by the oopic.

Do you think I could look at an example of the I2C code for the max5477?

Thanks again,

Carson

rtstofer <rstofer@pacbell.net> wrote: --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, carson hoyt <carr6565@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Richard that is exactly the kind of information I'm looking
for. Another thing, I'm really looking to use multiple digipots, if I
am making a lot of adjustments to the digipots is there going to be a
lag time since the connection is I2C? Also can I control the pots
individually on the I2C line if they are daisy chained together?
> Concerning resolution: I'm going to be using these pots in an audio
device. Should I be concerned about resolution. Right now I'm looking
at pots with 1000+ resolution but these are kind of expensive and not
available through my usual part supplier. I guess I'll just start
small and work my way. I really appreciate the help.
>
> Carson

There will be a way to have unique I2C addresses for quite a few
devices. At least 8 in the case of the Maxim MAX5477..MMAX5479.
Beyond that, things get complicated. Remember to divide the address
by 2 when using the OOPic. Why? Well, the least significant bit is
the R/W' bit and only the most significant 7 bits are address bits.

The lag time for an OOPic will vary because the OOPic has to read the
Basic code, interpret what needs to be done and then bit-bang the I2C
message. Then it starts on the next 'pot. I would expect 5 mS
between 'pot adjustments but that is just a wild guess. I have never
timed it. It could be much more...

If speed is your requirement, the OOPic isn't the way to get there.
The 'pots can handle a 400 kHz clock rate and, if each command takes 3
bytes, you would be looking at changing them at more than 10,000 times
a second. Or all 8 in about a mS! But that would be with a more
capable uC and coding in C.

Richard

---------------------------------
Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel today!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/