think a little of both will be possible, like one product would be the
ooBug, and the the other will be a 16/32 bit OOpic in a OOPic C form factor.
___________________
Ray Xu
rayxu@tx.rr.com
DPRG <http://www.dprg.org> member
OOPic <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/> group member
Seattle <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeattleRobotics/> Robotics
group member
My Blog <http://rayxublogs.blogspot.com/>
-----Original Message-----
From: oopic@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oopic@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Jon
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2008 7:23 PM
To: oopic@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [oopic] Re: Everyone please read. - Future of the ooPIC.
I love the features of the OOBug, but I also really like the more basic,
truly customizable nature of the older OOPics... The OOBug seems to have so
many things already built-in that it takes away from the challenges and
possibilities involved in making a more specified bot from "scratch". Also,
are there going to be other models with different features?
-Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment