This Forum is Dedicated For all The Object Oriented PIC Lovers .......... The concept behind OOPic is straight forward. Use preprogrammed multitasking Objects from a library of highly optimized Objects to do all the work of interacting with the hardware. Then write small scripts in Basic, C, or Java syntax styles to control the Objects. During operation, the Objects run continuously and simultaneously in the background while the scripts run in the foreground telling the objects what to do.

Monday, August 4, 2008

[oopic] Re: event fix. (Exe Ver 6.1.2) Removed for testing

I can't say how long it will be down Andy, he wont tell me either.

Yup, you have done some good work. What does that mean exactly?

I would say the stance of dogging a guys efforts was not probably the
best choice now was it? He stopped doing what he was doing (stuff
that pays) to try and redeem on a promise, he did that. In order to
save time he basically said "you test it" (meaning the comm.). He
never said that was it did he? If it is broken we will fix it more.

Now lets see, oh yea.. now you have resulted to name calling. That is
a sure fire way to get the compiler put back up.

So who is the villain here? Scott or I never resulted to calling you
a name did we? We did not second guess your work did we? We did not
even tell you how to do your work.

As far as I am concerned Scott was nice about it. I do not know when
he will put it back up but I bet an apology would go a long way. You
can dog the guy for missing a deadline, thats cool. You can even dog
the product, but you don't ask for something then complain cause it
does not suit you. He says it should work so save your complaints
until you either try it or test it.

Keep in mind my previous predicament. I don't have a copy of the new
version either. I really need one to test on... yup, even I can't
have a copy.

Ted

--- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Porrett <slicerwizard@...> wrote:
>
> At 01:03 AM 8/5/2008, theo570 wrote:
> >Ummm Andy, it has been an hour... I say even money the rest of the
> >users would really appreciate the ability to download the compiler.
>
> Scott has shown his true colors and now you are doing the same.
And
> your customers are watching. Keep up the good work.
>
> BTW, what would my, or anyone else's, motivation be to work for
tards
> who act like you two do? And don't think that any of the members
> here aren't going to see right through your lame attempts to make
me
> the villain in this mess you created. I'll be nice and bring you
up
> to speed here: besides helping users here from time to time, I have
> written and shared with everyone:
>
> - C syntax preprocessor; allows users to write OOPic code using
> real C syntax, not the quasi-C that the compiler uses; supports C
> directives like #define and #include; provides local scope for
> variables defined inside functions (just like real C); supports
real
> function calls (foo() rather than just foo), real return(value)
> statements, rather than the OOPic funcname=value; return form;
string
> pointer variables (is that even in V6?), plus about a dozen other
> useful features.
>
> - DOS-based OOPic program uploader/downloader
>
> - disassembler; Lost your source code? Just download the binary
> from your OOPic's EEPROM and run it through the disassembler. Or
> just curious as to what the compiled code looks like and the view
> provided by the compiler isn't very helpful? Just feed your .oex
> file to the disassembler.
>
>
> Further, when whatever site Scott was using to host beta compiler
> downloads was having issues (like exceeded bandwidth limits), I
> hosted the files on my own web space.
>
>
> >I really did not think he would do it. I am almost shocked... I
did not
> >think he had it in him. Funnier than hell though, I wish it were my
> >idea. I have that hardcore Marine Corps type of humor though....
>
> Yep, great management skills he's got there. Probably explains why
> his projects aren't doing so well.
>
> So how long until he reverses his "removed for testing"
> stance? History shows that what you guys say one day will be
> worthless the next day. Besides, his "threat" is meaningless,
since
> users who have already downloaded the file will share it.
>
>
> ...Andy
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: