Re: [oopic] Does oMathC work?

I'll have to check the manual when I get back to the desk. There
have been lots of changes with the V.6 compiler and I don't have them
all internalized yet.
I'm assuming that you want to use this with a PID or PD loop or you
wouldn't care about setting the update intervals with any particular
precision.
I'll post again when I know more.

DLC

Shaggy wrote:
> I don't fully understand what you are saying here, could you expand on it a
> bit? My goal is to have the math operation occur once per second. I was
> under the impression that for the oMathC object, having a 1Hz signal on the
> process clock would do that. The exact name of the property for the process
> clock is not quite clear. I would have expected that the property name is
> ProcessClock due to the documentation, but that is not recognized. Process
> does appear to be recognized, but perhaps that is not the property name.
>
> As for Input1 and Input2, using cvLatch, the documentation states that it
> replaces the output with Input1, which is all I want to do. Input2 is not
> used in this case.
>
>
> ooPIC Tech Support wrote:
>
>>Hz1 is a flag property, which you would use with the clock or Operate
>>inputs. The input1 and input2 are data inputs (note that there is no
>>input) and you would need to use oBus to link that to something.
>>
>>DLC
>>
>>Shaggy wrote:
>>
>>>In putting together some odometer code, I wanted to move the value from
>>>the
>>>oQuadencode count to a oWord object all in a virtual circuit. To move a
>>>word, I figured that the way to go would be the oMath object in cvLatch
>>>mode. However, I wanted to do that once every second, so I used the
>>>oMathC
>>>object and tried to link the ooPIC.Hz1 to the timer. I used several
>>>variations of this line:
>>>
>>>(assuming that lMath is declared as New oMathC)
>>>
>>>lMath.Process.Input.Link(ooPIC.Hz1)
>>>
>>>I get an error saying that Input is not a member of oMath. I note that
>>>the
>>>compiler is not saying that it is not an error of oMathC. To test this, I
>>>changed oMathC to oMathO, and got other errors that specifically referred
>>>to
>>>the oMathO object. Since the error I am getting refers to the oMath
>>>object,
>>>rather than the oMathC object, it leads me to believe that the oMathC is
>>>not
>>>actually implemented, despite using B2.2+ (which appears to include the
>>>oMathC object).
>>>
>>>Any suggestions?
>>
>>--
>>------------------------------------------------------
>>Dennis Clark ooPIC Tech Support
>>www.oopic.com
>>------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
>

--
------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Clark ooPIC Tech Support
www.oopic.com
------------------------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/