ooPIC, I've posted one such option, and it even does FP math on the GPS
strings. The ooPIC does not yet have good serial data processing
capability.
DLC
rtstofer wrote:
> --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, Andrew Porrett <slicerwizard@...> wrote:
>
>> At 09:07 AM 2/20/2008, rtstofer wrote:
>>
>>> Let's say the OOPic executes about 1000 instructions per second
>>> (although there are certainly examples where it only executes about
>>> 400).
>>>
>> I'd like to see an example that executes anywhere near 1000 user
>> source code lines per second. Hell, even 400 will impress me.
>>
>> Since this is so easy for anyone to verify, can someone explain why
>> the 1000 LOC/sec figure persists?
>>
>>
>> ...Andy
>>
>>
>
> When I use it, it is strictly a figment of my imagination. I thought
> I did a simple For ... Next loop and timed a bunch of iterations a
> long time ago. Nothing inside the loop, no objects defined, nada.
> Still it is just a WAG.
>
> Some lines of code are more complex than others. I would be just as
> happy using 400 LPM or even 200 LPM. The point of my using the
> figure is to point out how hopeless it is to plan on doing serial IO
> with the OOPic unless flow control can be implemented. Even then, it
> is hard to enforce flow control on such a small buffer. The sender
> may not be able to stop that fast if it has any kind of FIFO.
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------------
Dennis Clark ooPIC Tech Support
www.oopic.com
------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment