>When I use it, it is strictly a figment of my imagination. I thought
>I did a simple For ... Next loop and timed a bunch of iterations a
>long time ago. Nothing inside the loop, no objects defined, nada.
I did the same thing - the number was ~350.
>Some lines of code are more complex than others. I would be just as
>happy using 400 LPM or even 200 LPM. The point of my using the
>figure is to point out how hopeless it is to plan on doing serial IO
>with the OOPic unless flow control can be implemented.
When you use a figure of 1000 LOC/sec, it moves the problem in to the
doable-if-you-use-enough-tricks realm. At 350 LOC/sec, it's impossible.
>Even then, it
>is hard to enforce flow control on such a small buffer. The sender
>may not be able to stop that fast if it has any kind of FIFO.
At 1000 LOC/sec, I could pass on flow control. It would be a hack,
but it would work.
A thought occurs to me - the V5 code generation isn't the greatest;
if V6 does a better job, the 350 figure gets revised up (to
400-500?), but I haven't looked at code V6 generates, so it's just
idle speculation at this point.
...Andy
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
No comments:
Post a Comment