This Forum is Dedicated For all The Object Oriented PIC Lovers .......... The concept behind OOPic is straight forward. Use preprogrammed multitasking Objects from a library of highly optimized Objects to do all the work of interacting with the hardware. Then write small scripts in Basic, C, or Java syntax styles to control the Objects. During operation, the Objects run continuously and simultaneously in the background while the scripts run in the foreground telling the objects what to do.

Thursday, December 13, 2007

[oopic] Re: Serial Program Cable for ooPIC-S

Thanks for the encouragement on my first purchase Richard.

One more question if you don't mind. when you say not to use the +5v to
drive
external devices to avoid blowing the regulator, do you think its
safe to use it just to drive the input coil of relays? I purchased
this relay board:
http://www.superdroidrobots.com/shop/item.asp?itemid=547&catid=44
<http://www.superdroidrobots.com/shop/item.asp?itemid=547&catid=44>
http://www.elexol.com/Downloads/IO%20Relay%20Output%20Board20DS11.pdf
<http://www.elexol.com/Downloads/IO%20Relay%20Output%20Board20DS11.pdf>

Thanks Again
--- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "rtstofer" <rstofer@...> wrote:
>
> --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "bb261998" bb261998@ wrote:
> >
> > Has anyone had success with this usb equivalent RS232 translator?
> > http://www.acroname.com/robotics/parts/S22-USB-SERIAL-INT-CONN.html
> >
> > I'm fortunate enough to have serial on my laptop but highly doubt my
> > next laptop will.
> >
>
> There is no reason it won't work. That FTDI chip is used in a lot of
> USB->Serial adapter cables. Depending on which IDE you are using, you
> may need to go to Device Manager and change the COM port. It must be
> COM1..COM4 for V5 while V6 allows higher numbers. Don't forget to
> TELL the IDE which port to use rather than allowing it to guess. That
> hasn't worked out very well for other users.
>
> Don't worry about having the S board vs the R board. Over time you
> will find that you are much better off. You don't have LEDs and
> switches camped out on the A/D lines and you don't have some IOLines
> dedicated to peripherals you don't have. You also have the ability to
> use a 2d EEPROM for data storage with no possibility of writing over
> the program.
>
> The RS232 port on the R board doesn't provide REAL RS232 voltage
> levels and there are applications where it just doesn't work. It is
> also difficult to gut the level shifters if you want to work with a
> device that accepts TTL levels.
>
> The only downside to the S board is the TINY voltage regulator. Don't
> try to provide +5V to external devices from the R board. Use a
> separate supply.
>
> Yes, I have an S board (or two) and no, I do not have an R board.
> Frankly, if I wanted a full featured OOPic board, I would buy the
> MiniSumo Mark III OOPic controller for
> http://www.junun.org/MarkIII/Info.jsp?item=28 I have a couple of
> those. The plug-in prototype board is one of my favorites
> http://www.junun.org/MarkIII/Info.jsp?item=4.
>
> Richard
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: