This Forum is Dedicated For all The Object Oriented PIC Lovers .......... The concept behind OOPic is straight forward. Use preprogrammed multitasking Objects from a library of highly optimized Objects to do all the work of interacting with the hardware. Then write small scripts in Basic, C, or Java syntax styles to control the Objects. During operation, the Objects run continuously and simultaneously in the background while the scripts run in the foreground telling the objects what to do.

Friday, August 1, 2008

[oopic] Re: Savage Innovations / Compiler / ooBug and etc.. UPDATE

OK that one is my bad. The ooPic Pro series will probably end up on
an R board. I should not have left that out. The S board may not have
enough physical real estate.

New IC, new IC for USB, USB conn., 2 power supps etc.

Sorry for not keeping that clear.

Ted

--- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "ray xu" <rayxu@...> wrote:
>
> And plus, maybe it would be a good idea to make the oobug into the
oopic C,
> S, or R form (Just replace the chipset). It would be a lot more
flexible,
> especially to me, and it would keep the R, S, and C still on-the-
shelf.
>
>
>
> ___________________
> Ray Xu
> rayxu@...
> DPRG <http://www.dprg.org> member
> OOPic <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/> group member
> Seattle <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeattleRobotics/>
Robotics
> group member
> My Blog <http://rayxublogs.blogspot.com/>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oopic@yahoogroups.com [mailto:oopic@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of ray
> xu
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 7:44 PM
> To: oopic@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: [oopic] Re: Savage Innovations / Compiler / ooBug and
etc..
> UPDATE
>
>
>
> Ok now that you have cleared up things before I left, that settles
things
> for me; I may still go with the oopic, but still unsure. The least
> you/Savage can do is spare the compiler and the tech stuff.
>
> Also, there's one more thing your missing about the compiler
problems; its
> that when you have another language besides English installed on
the PC, the
> compiler gets very confused and doesn't operate properly.
>
> ___________________
> Ray Xu
> rayxu@... <mailto:rayxu%40tx.rr.com> com
> DPRG <http://www.dprg. <http://www.dprg.org> org> member
> OOPic <http://tech. <http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/>
> groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/> group member
> Seattle <http://tech.
<http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/SeattleRobotics/>
> groups.yahoo.com/group/SeattleRobotics/> Robotics
> group member
> My Blog <http://rayxublogs. <http://rayxublogs.blogspot.com/>
blogspot.com/>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oopic@yahoogroups. <mailto:oopic%40yahoogroups.com> com
> [mailto:oopic@yahoogroups. <mailto:oopic%40yahoogroups.com> com] On
Behalf
> Of
> theo570
> Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 7:38 PM
> To: oopic@yahoogroups. <mailto:oopic%40yahoogroups.com> com
> Subject: [oopic] Re: Savage Innovations / Compiler / ooBug and
etc.. UPDATE
>
> Ok so that didn't go over too well... Please take the time and READ!
>
> I am sorry guys, don't blame the messenger. I am not the major
share
> holder in the program here, rather, the little guy that gets the
> dirty work.
>
> The decision was decreed to me and I passed it along.
>
> SO now we wont gloss over any facts... 2 YES 2 whole ooPics sold in
> July. Yup we can sure make a business out of that. Thats what? 170
> bucks worth of sales, care to run a business on that? When it was
300
> units a month no problem or even 100 but 2? Don't forget that the
> whopping 170 is before we pay to have the boards made and pay for a
> website and pay for packaging etc... We also can't buy the boards
one
> at a time, they come in hundreds.
>
> I truely am sorry that two different days had two different
versions,
> I did pass on the decisions play by play, right or wrong.
>
> It does suck, for me as much as you. Not only is every robot I own
> ooPic powered, some going back two A1 boards, I teach robotics as
> well and guess what... every student I have is using one version or
> another of the ooPic. I slipped once and used an avr, but I jumped
> back.
>
> I can't un make you pissed off and I can't make it all better. Of
> course we do not want you to leave, that would be silly. I know
that
> SI has traditionally been weak on after the sale support and we are
> trying to fix that. Anyone feel free to chime in and offer to do
tech
> support for free? Dennis did not want to...
>
> I will talk to Scott further about the compiler and see if he can't
> patch up the oEvent code before it is fully retired. The only two
> real complaints that I could find by reading back, and recent
posts,
> come down to bad oEvents and Vista issues correct?
>
> Dennis was not let go like some are trying to imply. Before my time
> there was another much larger partner who decided to quit paying
him
> then that partner decided to move along, thats when I came along.
> Things were bad and we had one new product that was starting to
sell.
>
> Please try and understand the business side of the decision, no
money
> coming in means it is very hard to dedicate unpaid time to that
> product. As much as we would like to keep on going with the old we
> personnaly cannot, we all have bills to pay and the new might pay
> them. Every decision made was strictly financial.
>
> I will move the compiler files to somewhere else. That site being
> down was unitentional, poorly timed and certianly not done on
> purpose. I will let you know where they end up. I am not even sure
> why it went down just yet.
>
> If you do decide to move along we are sorry to see you go and THANK
> YOU for all the years of support. If you read the above, you now
> understand why the decisions were made and we hope that with a
little
> patience you will stick it out for the ooPic Pro series.
>
> If you did decide to hang in there then THANK YOU to that crowd.
>
> If you have already swam the river all we can do is try to make a
> better product with better support and try to get you to swim back.
>
> Really, if you feel qualified and want to hang the moniker of SI
Tech
> Support on your signature send me an email. It is an unpaid
position
> for now but that will change in the future we hope. bigbug@oobug.
> <mailto:bigbug%40oobug.com> com.
>
> Jessica, It seems you may have inadvertantly left some of the facts
> out of your post and because we have worked together for so long I
> will not correct your mistakes in here. You may however contact me
> for a complete and correct list. Your financial woes in business
and
> with SI/Pentar were before my time.
>
> Ted
> Savage Innovations
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>

------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: