the dog can only lay in the shade getting kicked for so long. ooPic
problems I can handle, SI problems I can handle but when it starts to
get personal I bite back.
Now that we can start to move along... I am looking for content for
the all new and improved SI Robot Projects website. I need blurbs and
pics of any and all ooPic, Soundgin etc based projects. I do hope the
users community has something. Your projects do not need to be robots
by common definition, just simply ooPic based circuits are cool. If
you can try to include source code. Please post under the topic of
ROBOT PROJECTS so I can find em' easily.
Thanks,
Ted
Savage Innovations
--- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "tinslwc" <tinslwc@...> wrote:
>
> This should not be posted in a public forum. There is nothing
> beneficial to the OOPIC community here. It is quite obivious that
we
> are all frustrated. Savage has said that he will fix the oEvent
for
> us which is the main thing that we wanted.
>
> So, why don't we get this forum back to helping people with
problems
> that we can fix and keep the politics to a minimum. We have people
> here with years of knowledge and when we collaborate, we can do
> anything.
>
> --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "theo570" <theo570@> wrote:
> >
> > OK Jess,
> >
> > You are going to try and bring this public and so far I have
> resisted
> > but what the hell, even I get mad after awhile.
> >
> > 1 - The Bot Shop was in trouble (by your own words via phone)
LONG
> > before I was offered a partnership in SI.
> >
> > 2 - "New guy" and "this guy"? Is that to give the public the
> > impression that we have not worked together off and on for say 5
> > maybe 6 years?
> >
> > 3 - We didn't seem to miserable when we were laughing and joking
at
> > Scotts expense a few months ago on the phone.
> >
> > 4 - Anything you claim unpaid was before me becoming a partner so
> how
> > does that fit? Actually it goes back to the partnership with
> Pentar...
> >
> > 5 - None of your graphics were hijacked because none were
selected
> > for use. You did make a killer blister pack art package,
> > unfortunately we are not using a blister pack. If we were, we
would
> > be using it. I did call Gates and nope, no one ever agreed to pay
> for
> > that if it was unused.
> >
> > 6 - the umm 1986 web design... LOL IT IS YOUR WORK. Yes we will
> > indeed change it as the new one is about done. I don't think we
can
> > claim that one unpaid and we both know why... let that dog sleep.
> >
> > 7 - Yea, I know you are pissed that the EDU board did not sell
thus
> > your manual did not get used. We can't help it if a product was a
> > dismal flop. What did we sell, 10 - 15. I know there are over a
> > hundred in stock for the last year. You are not the only one not
> > getting paid on the EDU board. I spent 6 months trying to find a
> > vendor or a school to buy them... Do keep in mind the SI EDU
board
> > was in the works way before I even brought the ooBug to the table
> and
> > even then I thought it was a silly product, almost a backstep if
> you
> > will. I never expected it to sell and said as much to SI and
Pentar.
> >
> > 8 - It was just a few months ago when you and I had a long phone
> call
> > and most of the topic was the failing of TBS. Did I not offer you
> all
> > of my ooBug mod kit ideas and did I not agree to not sell them
> myself
> > if it would help YOU out?
> >
> > Jess, you are acting like someone dropped you and it just never
> > happened. Do not take out your frustrations on me because you are
> > having business financial woes. We have been e or phone friends
for
> > quite awhile.
> >
> > Ted
> > Savage Innovations
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "jesicaflow" <jesicaflow@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I am probably closing down The BotShop due to this whole mess.
> New
> > > guy has been miserable to deal with. I have completed unpaid
> > projects
> > > and started new ones (which I am no longer working on) only to
> have
> > > them hijacked and/ or bastardized by him. I'm over it just as
> much
> > > as the customers are.
> > >
> > > I'm so sorry you guys are having to deal with this frustration.
> > >
> > > --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "theo570" <theo570@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > David there is no double speak at all as you put it. It is
> simply
> > a
> > > > matter of economics.
> > > >
> > > > If you would have read all of my posts I did state I will try
> and
> > > get
> > > > SS to look into oEvents again if nothing else to put the
> compiler
> > > to
> > > > bed happy.
> > > >
> > > > Jessica as The Bot Shop has been a great outlet for SI/ooPic
> and
> > > > still is until she states differently. Yes, she has excellent
> CS
> > > and
> > > > Yes we have crappy CS. We can get better, thats where I get
to
> > come
> > > > in. Try to put out fires before they burn. Jessica was the
> first
> > > and
> > > > still first listed outlet for the ooBug because of her
efforts
> > and
> > > > CS. She will be a retailer for the ooBug until I see a letter
> or
> > > > email from her stating otherwise.
> > > >
> > > > If we just can't do it for you then we are sorry. We will try
> and
> > > > make the next guy happy.
> > > >
> > > > Ted
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, dldlhfd@ wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Jesica at The Bot Shop,
> > > > > I purchased an OOpic-C chip and board from you in
> November
> > > of
> > > > 07.
> > > > > Through no fault of yours the product did not work as
> > > advertised.
> > > > I thought and
> > > > > OOpic tech support thought that it was a hardware problem.
> You
> > > > were kind enough
> > > > > to replace it for me. Then we found out it was really the
> > > > compiler. Savage
> > > > > promised a fix by May 08. Now it is August 08 and Savage
> > > > industries just sent
> > > > > the OOpic forum the following comments:
> > > > >
> > > > > 2 - All previous version of ooPic ie. S,R and C will be
> > > considered
> > > > > > > legacy products at this time and will no longer be
> > > > manufactured.
> > > > > In
> > > > > > > addition we will be no longer supporting these items.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > 3 - All versions of the compiler will also go on the
> > > > unsupported
> > > > > > > legacy list.
> > > > >
> > > > > As I write this Ted is on the forum trying to do some
double
> > > speak
> > > > about how
> > > > > they have to abandon these products because they just
don't
> > sell
> > > > anymore.
> > > > > They only sold two in July.
> > > > > I don't expect you to bad mouth any product or company
I
> > > know
> > > > that's bad
> > > > > business, But for the customers sake would you please have
> > > anybody
> > > > that is
> > > > > thinking about choosing between a OOpic and something else
> to
> > > > please read the
> > > > > OOpic forum on Yahoo to get a clear picture of the kind of
> > > support
> > > > that they
> > > > > will get.
> > > > > Thank you again for your help David Davis
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits
> in
> > > your
> > > > budget?
> > > > > Read reviews on AOL Autos.
> > > > > (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?
> > > > ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment