You are going to try and bring this public and so far I have resisted
but what the hell, even I get mad after awhile.
1 - The Bot Shop was in trouble (by your own words via phone) LONG
before I was offered a partnership in SI.
2 - "New guy" and "this guy"? Is that to give the public the
impression that we have not worked together off and on for say 5
maybe 6 years?
3 - We didn't seem to miserable when we were laughing and joking at
Scotts expense a few months ago on the phone.
4 - Anything you claim unpaid was before me becoming a partner so how
does that fit? Actually it goes back to the partnership with Pentar...
5 - None of your graphics were hijacked because none were selected
for use. You did make a killer blister pack art package,
unfortunately we are not using a blister pack. If we were, we would
be using it. I did call Gates and nope, no one ever agreed to pay for
that if it was unused.
6 - the umm 1986 web design... LOL IT IS YOUR WORK. Yes we will
indeed change it as the new one is about done. I don't think we can
claim that one unpaid and we both know why... let that dog sleep.
7 - Yea, I know you are pissed that the EDU board did not sell thus
your manual did not get used. We can't help it if a product was a
dismal flop. What did we sell, 10 - 15. I know there are over a
hundred in stock for the last year. You are not the only one not
getting paid on the EDU board. I spent 6 months trying to find a
vendor or a school to buy them... Do keep in mind the SI EDU board
was in the works way before I even brought the ooBug to the table and
even then I thought it was a silly product, almost a backstep if you
will. I never expected it to sell and said as much to SI and Pentar.
8 - It was just a few months ago when you and I had a long phone call
and most of the topic was the failing of TBS. Did I not offer you all
of my ooBug mod kit ideas and did I not agree to not sell them myself
if it would help YOU out?
Jess, you are acting like someone dropped you and it just never
happened. Do not take out your frustrations on me because you are
having business financial woes. We have been e or phone friends for
quite awhile.
Ted
Savage Innovations
--- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "jesicaflow" <jesicaflow@...> wrote:
>
> I am probably closing down The BotShop due to this whole mess. New
> guy has been miserable to deal with. I have completed unpaid
projects
> and started new ones (which I am no longer working on) only to have
> them hijacked and/ or bastardized by him. I'm over it just as much
> as the customers are.
>
> I'm so sorry you guys are having to deal with this frustration.
>
> --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, "theo570" <theo570@> wrote:
> >
> > David there is no double speak at all as you put it. It is simply
a
> > matter of economics.
> >
> > If you would have read all of my posts I did state I will try and
> get
> > SS to look into oEvents again if nothing else to put the compiler
> to
> > bed happy.
> >
> > Jessica as The Bot Shop has been a great outlet for SI/ooPic and
> > still is until she states differently. Yes, she has excellent CS
> and
> > Yes we have crappy CS. We can get better, thats where I get to
come
> > in. Try to put out fires before they burn. Jessica was the first
> and
> > still first listed outlet for the ooBug because of her efforts
and
> > CS. She will be a retailer for the ooBug until I see a letter or
> > email from her stating otherwise.
> >
> > If we just can't do it for you then we are sorry. We will try and
> > make the next guy happy.
> >
> > Ted
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, dldlhfd@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Jesica at The Bot Shop,
> > > I purchased an OOpic-C chip and board from you in November
> of
> > 07.
> > > Through no fault of yours the product did not work as
> advertised.
> > I thought and
> > > OOpic tech support thought that it was a hardware problem. You
> > were kind enough
> > > to replace it for me. Then we found out it was really the
> > compiler. Savage
> > > promised a fix by May 08. Now it is August 08 and Savage
> > industries just sent
> > > the OOpic forum the following comments:
> > >
> > > 2 - All previous version of ooPic ie. S,R and C will be
> considered
> > > > > legacy products at this time and will no longer be
> > manufactured.
> > > In
> > > > > addition we will be no longer supporting these items.
> > > > >
> > > > > 3 - All versions of the compiler will also go on the
> > unsupported
> > > > > legacy list.
> > >
> > > As I write this Ted is on the forum trying to do some double
> speak
> > about how
> > > they have to abandon these products because they just don't
sell
> > anymore.
> > > They only sold two in July.
> > > I don't expect you to bad mouth any product or company I
> know
> > that's bad
> > > business, But for the customers sake would you please have
> anybody
> > that is
> > > thinking about choosing between a OOpic and something else to
> > please read the
> > > OOpic forum on Yahoo to get a clear picture of the kind of
> support
> > that they
> > > will get.
> > > Thank you again for your help David Davis
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > **************Looking for a car that's sporty, fun and fits in
> your
> > budget?
> > > Read reviews on AOL Autos.
> > > (http://autos.aol.com/cars-BMW-128-2008/expert-review?
> > ncid=aolaut00050000000017 )
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
No comments:
Post a Comment