This Forum is Dedicated For all The Object Oriented PIC Lovers .......... The concept behind OOPic is straight forward. Use preprogrammed multitasking Objects from a library of highly optimized Objects to do all the work of interacting with the hardware. Then write small scripts in Basic, C, or Java syntax styles to control the Objects. During operation, the Objects run continuously and simultaneously in the background while the scripts run in the foreground telling the objects what to do.

Monday, March 10, 2008

Re: [oopic] Re: New range finder needed

Similar idea :)

The CMUcam can be set up to track a colour ( such as the colour of the laser
dot ).

You know where the cmu is located ..
You know where the laser is located ( pointing straight forward )
You now know where the laser dot appears on the cameras imaging.

Triangulation gives you the distance to the target.

And , yes, there are many situations where it falls down .... But that is
where the
fun comes in to write the programs to analyse data :)

You can start scanning, but then you add in a lot more variables and start
to slow
things down as far as the robot is concerned.

Need to decide on what resolution you are happy with .... Something I was
told
a long time ago ( well, ish ... mid 80's ) was start with the specifications
you need
THEN turn to design ... Even now I am guilty of doing it the other way round
in my hobby :)

----- Original Message -----
From: "dan michaels" <oric_dan@yahoo.com>
To: <oopic@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:48 PM
Subject: [oopic] Re: New range finder needed


> --- In oopic@yahoogroups.com, Brian Lloyd <brian-wb6rqn@...> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mar 10, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Shaggy wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > I think I'm merging two different ideas. A camera would work for
>> > imaging the line, but if I was to use a camera, I'd not want to
> be throwing away the rest of the information included in the image,
> because there would be other things there that I could make use of.
>>
>> Certainly if you have the imager there you can use it to collect
>> images. But it seems reasonable to use the imager just to map
> objects.
>>
>
>
> For general mapping, this approach sounds lighty-ears more difficult
> than, say, just using a servo to pan a sonar. Large battalions of
> people have been working on computer vision for about 5 or 6
> **decades** now, and they still haven't cracked it.
>
> OTOH, in Joe Engelberger's 1989 book Robotics in Service, that I have
> been reading lately, he does mention a simpler way to use a video
> camera. Namely, you use a laser [could be a laser-diode pointer
> today] to cast a single bright "line" onto an object, and then use
> the camera to analyze the deflections as the line bends around
> objects, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/

<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/oopic/join

(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:oopic-digest@yahoogroups.com
mailto:oopic-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
oopic-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

No comments: